- Latin America
- Middle East/
- United States/
- International Security
- United Nations
- Views on Countries/
- Other Topics
Two-thirds of Iranians Ready to Preclude Developing Nuclear Weapons in Exchange for Lifting SanctionsSeptember 22, 2009
But Most Unwilling to Give Up Enrichment Despite Sanctions
A new WorldPublicOpinion.org poll finds that two-thirds of Iranians would favor their government precluding the development of nuclear weapons in exchange for the lifting of international sanctions against Iran.
Nantanz uranium-enrichment plant outside Tehran (NASA photo)
Only one-third would be ready to halt enrichment in exchange for lifting sanctions. However, another third, while insisting on continuing enrichment, would agree to grant international inspectors unrestricted access to nuclear facilities to ensure that that there are no bomb-making activities.
The WPO poll also finds that six in 10 Iranians believe that economic sanctions, imposed by the United States and the United Nations over fears that Iran's nuclear program might produce an atomic weapon, are having a negative impact. Seven in 10 say they believe sanctions will be tightened if Iran continues its current nuclear program.
Steven Kull, director of WPO, comments: "Though most Iranians are feeling the bite of economic sanctions and expect them to tighten, only a third are willing to negotiate away the right to enrich uranium. However, two-thirds are willing to make a deal that would preclude the development of nuclear weapons."
While the Iranian government has consistently said that it does not aspire to have nuclear weapons, the International Atomic Energy Agency has said that Iran has not been fully cooperative in regard to inspections of its program. Also while President Ahmadinejad in an interview with NBC News aired Sept. 17t said that Iran does not need nuclear weapons, he refused to say categorically that Iran will never develop them.
Kull adds, "For Iran to preclude the development of nuclear weapons through unrestricted access for inspectors would represent a significant step."
WPO conducted the poll of 1,003 Iranians across Iran between Aug. 27 and Sept. 10, 2009. The margin of error is 3.1%. Telephone surveys were conducted by a professional survey organization calling in from outside Iran. WPO, a collaborative project involving research centers from around the world, is managed by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland.
Asked to what degree sanctions have had a negative impact on Iran's situation, 60% of respondents to the WPO poll say there has been at least some negative impact, with 23% saying there has been a lot. Thirty percent say there has had only a little impact (15%) or none (15%).
Iranians are also pessimistic about sanctions in the future. If Iran continues enriching uranium, 70% expect sanctions to be increased. Only 19 percent say they will not be increased.
Concerns that Iran's nuclear program was not simply for energy but that Iran was working to develop nuclear weapons grade material emerged early in the decade. In 2005 the International Atomic Energy Agency declared Iran to be in violation of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, primarily for failure to provide information and access to the IAEA. In response, the United States and the United Nations increased existing sanctions against Iran.
Nonetheless most Iranians favor persisting with enrichment. Asked whether they would favor an agreement whereby the current sanctions would be removed and Iran would continue its nuclear energy program but agree not to enrich uranium, only 31% favor the idea, while 55% are opposed and 14% do not give an answer.
Even among those who say they voted for opposition candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi in the presidential election, 51% are opposed to agreeing to give up enriching uranium, while 43% favor the idea.
Those who did not support such a deal were asked whether they would favor another deal that would lift sanctions and allow Iran to continue uranium enrichment, but would grant international inspectors unrestricted access to all Iranian nuclear facilities to make sure that it is not making an atomic bomb. Thirty-four percent (of the whole sample) say they would favor such a deal, while 22% are opposed.
This means that a total of 65% express a readiness to make one or another deal that would prevent Iran from making a nuclear weapon.
Most Iranians do not want a nuclear weapon, apart from the question of sanctions. Fifty-eight percent say they do not want to develop an "atomic bomb," including 3% who oppose the nuclear program altogether. However 38% say they do favor developing an atomic bomb.
Iranians also express a readiness to enter into direct negotiations with the United States. Sixty-percent favor, while 30% oppose "full, unconditional negotiations" between their government and the United States. This may stem in part from growing confidence in Iran's ability to withstand pressure. Fifty-seven percent say that over the past four years Iran has become better able to stand up to foreign pressure.
This study was conducted with support from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Calvert Foundation.
Share article on: